 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the A-1 visa page were merged into A visa on 2018-03-27. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on A-1 visa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080328133944/http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/temp/wait/tempvisitors_wait.php to http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/wait/tempvisitors_wait.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editBecause the pages A-1 visa, A-2 visa, and A-3 visa share essentially all of their content, cover the same information, and are quite related, I propose merging them into one article. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 15:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support I think it would benefit from a merger. The articles are similar enough that merging them would improve the cohesiveness and context surrounding those visas. (Pinging L235) Acebulf (talk) 18:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds like common sense to me, definitely something that could have just been done WP:BOLDly. That'd be awesome if you wanted to do that for other types of visas too! Reywas92Talk 06:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Done: Merged into A visa. AidanSW (talk) 21:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
