Talk:A. C. Mack
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Badly out of date but edits keep getting removed
editCan we please start reviewing edits/sources before we unilaterally scrap them?
This article was recently published which contains citations/sources as well as video, photo and quotes to evidence all points: https://ecstasyofgoldwrestling.wordpress.com/2023/07/12/southeast-first-the-history-making-and-belt-taking-career-of-ac-mack
The sources are either primary (direct from promotions/AC Mack/award givers plus interviews, credible news sites and or Cagematch which is used as a source on the able already):
This article contains heaps of missing information from this wiki (awards, titles, tournaments) with sources. I’m trying to use these to get the page up to date.
AC Mack himself mentioned the quality of the article’s research: https://twitter.com/ac_mack/status/1679229343589883907?s=46&t=-c-j00_jDaOFdTzO7wDJ3Q
Is it possible to re-review the recent edits? AT least the ones with multiple sources or Cagematch?
It seems odd to delete edits which use Cagematch as a source because the above (well sourced) article was used for a separate edit point.
It’s becoming difficult to even fix typos on this page. If you actually review the edits made and the sources used, you will not find anything amiss.
I’m sure we’d like this page to reflect his full career and the various titles/awards/tournament he’s won. SugeRight (talk) 03:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- The problem, the websites aren't reliable. Who are these people? About section just says "A blog that celebrates the weird and winding careers of the traveling champions, belt collectors and journeymen of professional wrestling". Same with the Georgia Wrestling History. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 07:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)