Talk:A. R. Rahman/GA4

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

It's an honor to take up the review of an article on such a legend, and I find it really well-written too. I will post my comments in a week but for now I see a failed verification tag that must be fixed. Cheers, Sainsf (knock knock · am I there?) 17:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

@The9Man: There still are 3 maintenance tags that have not been fixed. Plus I looked at the sources and many (a Facebook photo, lots of Bollywood news websites) are clearly unreliable and many citations are poorly formatted. But the biggest issue is possible plagiarism from the official website, just look at this [1]. And also from [2]. Diannaa, pinging you as I have contacted you earlier on copyvio issues.. please let me know if the these are indeed serious violations. Though the prose appears good on the whole, and I have not gone through all of it yet I see a few errors in places ("There are two things could happen", "languages & The album received", "On January 2018, He has been appointed"). I will wait till the major issues are addressed before posting more comments. Sainsf (knock knock · am I there?) 20:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

These are serious violations and the GA nomination should be quick-failed. The should be listed at WP:CP for cleanup. Please let me know if you need help listing it there. — Diannaa (talk) 22:13, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Listed. I will fail this nom now. Thanks for your help, Diannaa. Sainsf 22:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)