Talk:A4061 road/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Vincent60030 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vincent60030 (talk · contribs) 04:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Starting. More soon. VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 04:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Route

edit
  • the Bwlch-y-Clawdd Road (known to locals simply as "the Bwlch") is the bracket part cited by the source?
I added a source. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

History

edit

Recent history

edit
  • "The landscape at the northern end of the A4061 has been extensively used for open cast mining, which remains an active industry." Deadlink
  • "In 2016, Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council announced a £1.25 million resurfacing package for the A4061 between Treherbert and Hirwaun. The road was closed for three weeks while the council laid around 6,000 tonnes of tarmac." another one too
Well they weren't dead when I added them. Harrumph. Replaced with similar sources. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Ritchie333: Bummer, the first one still returns an error 404. :/ VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 04:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I've put another one in. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:11, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

conclusion

edit
  • Woohoo that's all =D
Well it's not quite the same as taking a quick drive along the road during the summer (minding the sheep droppings), but there you go. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
And minding the curves :3 VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 04:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thou shall pass =D VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 04:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
  2c. it contains no original research.
  2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall assessment.