Talk:A601(M) motorway

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 188.28.135.31 in topic Self-contradictory

Why must the trivia section be removed??? What is wrong with it???

Trivia section

edit

If it is claimed that the M58 has a single carriageway section, as in the first item, then surely it has a roundabout (or two) in the middle, which means that the second fact is wrong. Fingerpuppet (talk) 09:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A601(M) motorway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A601(M) motorway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Self-contradictory

edit

This article states in one place that part of the route has been downgraded to B class, but doesn't give details, e.g. a B class road number. Most of the article, however, suggests that both branches are still motorway class, and the latest OS maps would seem to confirm this. The article needs the attention of someone who knows what the true situation is. --188.29.66.196 (talk) 19:50, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

The true situation is in the linked sources. The change happened only recently so some maps may still be out-of-date. I've now updated the whole article to remove any apparent contradictions. -- Dr Greg  talk  22:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your prompt and thorough response. This reads much better now. There's a pull-down routemap at the top right of the article, which still shows the old route designations. Is this using an external data source? --188.29.66.196 (talk) 07:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I've no idea how to edit the routemap. -- Dr Greg  talk  09:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Dr Greg: Someone changed the text to say the downgraded link road was now the B6601, even though neither of the cited references stated this. However this is, I believe, correct, so I have replaced these references with one from the Lancaster Guardian that does give the new number, as well as indicating the revocation order for the downgrading of the remaining portion of the motorway. Hope I've done all this correctly! --188.28.135.31 (talk) 10:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply