Talk:AARNet
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 October 2007. The result of the discussion was keep, nomination withdrawn. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on AARNet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150829215511/http://www.theage.com.au/ to http://www.theage.com.au/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on AARNet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.aarnet.edu.au/library/aarnet_annual_report_2004.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203005029/http://www.acma.gov.au/~/media/Regulatory%20Reform%20and%20Carrier%20Infrastructure/Spreadsheet/Register%20of%20Licensed%20Carriers.XLSX to http://www.acma.gov.au/~/media/Regulatory%20Reform%20and%20Carrier%20Infrastructure/Spreadsheet/Register%20of%20Licensed%20Carriers.XLSX
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.aarnet.edu.au/library/AARNetNationalMap_September_2013_Final.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131009194846/http://www.canarie.ca/en/about/partners/networks to http://www.canarie.ca/en/about/partners/networks
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Odd (sub)section titles/subtitles
editThe titles used in various places make the article sound like an 'advertisement' (for a lack of a better word), or like something you would find on an organization's own history page. E.g. "The early years – building the Internet in Australia", "The AARNet optical network grows", "Supporting big science". I think the sections, or at least their titles, should be revised. DpEpsilon (talk) 04:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, they could be changed to just summarise the content of the respective sections rather than provide judgements. On the other hand, descriptions like "building the Internet in Australia" are not that far fetched. --Nemo 08:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)