Wikipedia

Talk:ABC News (United States)/Archive 2

< Talk:ABC News (United States)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Certes in topic Q. re helping readers [more] where there is a red link
Archive 1Archive 2

Requested move 30 October 2015

Latest comment: 9 years ago14 comments13 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved Mike Cline (talk) 13:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


ABC News → ABC News (United States) – The current title is unfair. People that are looking for ABC News could be looking not only the American Broadcast Corporation, but also for the Australian Broadcast Corporation and the Albanian Broadcast Corporation. It doesn't not make any sense that the American version gets any privilege. Albanian222 (talk) 19:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 02 November 2016

Latest comment: 8 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Snowball closed as not moved (see immediately preceding section). (non-admin closure) Red Slash 16:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

– Article naming placed bias towards the U.S. service, irrespective of other similarly-named services dominant in other countries. Current page title should redirect to disambig page with the U.S. service given parentheses disambiguation in its page title to preserve WP:NPOV and prevent WP:WORLDVIEW. – – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steel1943 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Notifying Nick Mitchell 98 that their move request has been moved here for full discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 13:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Also, malformed move request updated. Included disambiguation page name change per WP:DABNAME. Steel1943 (talk) 14:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Some special banner

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This talk page needs a banner that has to do with requested moves. Georgia guy (talk) 16:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Maybe "Pageviews and long-term historical significance are still our only criteria for primary topic. Make sure that at least one of those is in your favor before you request another move." Red Slash 17:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 10 November 2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago8 comments7 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. per WP:SNOW В²C ☎ 23:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)


ABC News → ABC News (United States) – disambiguate from ABC News in Australia. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). TonyBallioni (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Senate Denies General Officer Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Would Your News Agency be interested in a story about the U.S. Senate denying a general officer a promotion from one star to two stars based on a Department of the Army (DA) Inspector General (IG) investigation in Wiesbaden, Germany, if there is a cover-up?

Hi— I’m contacting your news agency because I’ve tried to provide this story to larger news organizations and I believe their postal mail, email, and text messages are being censored. A similar story about a Navy admiral took years to get in the news, so I’m not terribly worried. The basic story will eventually break (basic story: In 2016 the U.S. Senate denied a general officer a promotion based on an IG investigation and, wow, is U.S. Army Europe/USAREUR still doing a lot to cover it up). I used to work in Wiesbaden, and I was there when the general had his promotion denied. I sat in a session in which civilian employees were essentially asked if they were being forced to do things they didn’t want to do, and I am fairly certain that’s how the DA IG investigation report will read – once we get our hands on it (I've been trying to break this story for the past two years). If you can obtain a copy of the DA IG report, please post a PDF copy of the report online along with the story when you break it. I can expand on the story once it hits AP newswires. I’m sure it will be redacted, but I can fill in a lot of the blanks. Feel free to call U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) Public Affairs Office (PAO) at this number: +49-611-143-537-0005 or 0006 Outside Germany, add your country's International Direct Dialing code plus "49" before the desired number. It’s usually 011, but some telephone carriers have different ones; so, normally dial the whole number like this: 011-49-611-143-537-0005 or 0006 Keep in mind that anything the USAREUR PAO says may be part of a cover-up. For instance, if they don’t confirm the basic story, they are perpetuating a cover-up that’s been ongoing since 2016. For some reason they really, really, really do not want the DA IG report to get in the news. Don’t know if this is Pulitzer-level stuff, but it might be.

Current Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request status and how-to: If you would like to be the first news agency to break the story:

  • Email the DA IG FOIA Office here: usarmy.pentagon.hqda-otig.mbx.saig-zxl@mail.mil
  • Ask for a copy of the “calendar year 2016 IG investigation report that caused the United States Senate to deny promotion to major general officer rank (O-8) for the Deputy Chief of Staff for U.S. Army Europe, headquartered in Wiesbaden, Germany (DA IG FOIA Records Release Office knows the name of the general officer, because I emailed them the name).
  • An alternate method to obtain the IG report would be to re-initiate the FOIA request by going here and using a Department of Defense (DOD) IG FOIA account to request the report: https://foiaonline.regulations.gov/foia/action/public/home
  • I initially requested the Wiesbaden report through DOD IG FOIA, and they responded by re-directing me to the DA IG FOIA Office. That’s how I know the report is at DA.

I’ll contact your news agency to talk about the cover-up after the basic story finally gets in the news. -- The reason I’m asking for assistance in obtaining the IG report is because I believe my FOIA requests have been blocked as part of the cover-up. Whoever you talk to can say whatever they want, but the key to this story is the DA IG report. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DF:9BD8:C141:81E1:A85E:A969:7ECD (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Those old news briefs

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I remember back in the 1980s when ABC ran news briefs during breaks from programming. There was even a sports brief (done by Dick Schapp) and a business brief. These briefs always had me associate ABC News with the 1980s. And also, what about the old Weekend Report? If you don't believe the importance of mentioning ABC's prior use of briefs, how come briefs are mentioned in the CBS News article? SOMEONE PLEASE GET THE FACTS AND POST ABOUT THIS UNFORGETTABLE SEGMENT OF ABC NEWS. -Amit

New upcoming join the news Hrshrama (talk) 16:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please forgive me if this is the wrong place to ask this question.

I noticed that there is some info out there on the internet about << Erielle Reshef – Correspondent[44] >> that is seemingly reliable enough (e.g., to be "linked to" from a Wikipedia footnote). For example, THIS web page: https://bio-pedia.com/erielle-reshef/ seems to have a lot of useful-looking info (albeit interspersed, perhaps, with a lot of mild-mannered ads).

At first I thought that maybe she (Erielle) was notable enough for a web site like "bio-pedia dot com", but was perhaps NOT notable enough to have an actual article (in article space) on Wikipedia.

Not so!

Today I noticed (probably after doing a search) that not only Erielle Reshef but also several other (apparently notable) ABC News employees ... are listed here (in this article), but... with a link that is not yet a regular blue (i.e., non-red) link.

Once I saw that, I realized that, the editor who included any one of those [several] red links, was probably of the opinion that the person (e.g. Erielle Reshef) was sufficiently notable to have an actual article (in article space) on Wikipedia.

The reason why the article was not created may have been just that the editor was busy and did not have time for it. (or ... maybe some other reason, other than not being notable enough.)

I also am not about to create a new article, just because I saw that web page on the web site "bio-pedia dot com". (By the way, as far as I know, I had never heard of the web site "bio-pedia dot com" before.)

However, I think that (at least, until there is a Wikipedia article [in article space] about Erielle Reshef), there should probably be a link [perhaps in a footnote?] pointing to that web page on the web site "bio-pedia dot com", ... from somewhere near the extant red link that is displayed as (well ... as of 20 July 2022 it was displayed as) "Erielle Reshef".

(right?)

Thanks for listening! Any comments? Mike Schwartz (talk) 18:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm struggling to find any sources which whould show Reshef to be anywhere near passing Wikipedia:Notability (people). The bio-pedia page reads as if it was written by computer from a database entry. They probably have a similar page about me; I'm not notable either. If there is a mistake here it's that the red link should be black. Certes (talk) 18:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:ABC_News_(United_States)/Archive_2&oldid=1236403519"