Talk:ABC Wasp/Peer review

Peer Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Born2flie

Peer review (see here for criteria)

---

Peer review, as requested on WP:Aviation's Peer review. Conducted on 29 December 2008.

1. Prose

   a. well written: b. comprehensive: c. factually accurate: d. summary style:

   • first sentence contains awkward reference to indirect object, the engineer. Possibly rewrite the sentence to not include the awkward reference to previous employment.
   • short article, closer to Start-Class as it does not adequately cover the development of the engine, such as the impetus for beginning the development and the reasons for ceasing development.
   • rewrite "noteworthiness" out of the article. Article does not need to express noteworthiness or notability. Notability becomes evident with the information in the article and the sources included.

2. References

   a. use of inline citations: b. reliable sources: c. No original research:

3. Style

   a. lead section: b. appropriate structure: c. conforms to WP:MOS:

   • no lead section, probably due to lack of coverage of subject.
   • using the aircraft template for See also introduces "Comparable aircraft" rather than "Comparable engines".
   • structure used complies with MOS.

4. Controversy

   a. neutral point of view: b. stable, with no edit wars:

5. Graphics

   a. quality: b. image licenses:

   Consider moving the image to the See also section and left-aligning the image to break up the image with the infobox.

6. Quality:

   Article classification:

   Start-Class. Not really comprehensive enough to be a B-Class, but it has all the required characteristics. {{WPAVIATION}} banner will classify it as a C-Class when evaluated by the B-Class checklist. --Born2flie (talk) 16:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.