Potential sources

edit
  • Ellery, David (31 March 2012). "Smith under attack from ship critics". The Canberra Times. Retrieved 3 June 2012. and the Navy's response at http://www.navy.gov.au/On_The_Record:_Chief_of_Navy%27s_letter_to_the_editor_in_response_to_Skandi_Bergen_amphibious_claims

Is Ocean Shield commissioned into, or 'merely' operated by the RAN

edit

See Talk:Royal Australian Navy#RAN Commissioned ships. -- saberwyn 11:13, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

STrange you dont mention when the ship was built at all, it seems she was just born from nowhere (norway)

edit

but when? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.20.192.229 (talk) 06:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

None of the sources used in the article, or that I've seen, specify when exactly the ship was ordered, or when construction started. If you know of such sources, please provide (although don't get confused with the 2007-laid down Skandi Bergen, which became ACV Ocean Protector, or the subsequent Skandi Bergen ordered as a replacement). -- saberwyn 08:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Now RAN or Customs/BorderForce?

edit

The original plan for Ocean Shield to transfer to Customs in 2016, once the two Canberra class LHDs were in service. The last piece of cited information to confirm this was published in 2012. Now, at the end of 2015, the ship is no longer listed on the RAN website (and the link to the ship's page is now "Access Denied"). I assume from this that the transfer has happened (but could be wrong), so does anyone have any recent WP:RS about the status of the ship and its current operator?

Once we have solid confirmation of the transfer, this article will need to be updated, references to Ocean Shield being an active RAN ship will need to be removed from Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence Force List of active Royal Australian Navy ships, and relevant Customs/BorderForce pages will need to list the ship as active. -- saberwyn 10:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

and "Australian Border Force Cutterye gods (ABFC) Ocean Shield" is listed at the BorderForce website... thanks @Nick-D:. What would be really nice is a news article or similar covering the change. -- saberwyn 10:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Google News doesn't return anything. There's an ABC news story about "ACV Ocean Shield" in February here and the Border Force website also has photos of the ship in Customs livery taken in May 2015 here, so the transfer must have happened a while ago. I'm with you on calling this ship a "cutter"! Nick-D (talk) 10:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Lack of news on transfer = on-water matters?
BorderForce seems to be taking the US Coast Guard view that every vessel bigger than a tinnie is a cutter. If only there were sources detailing the change from ACV and its reasoning (see point 1).
On another note, if the CC-BY copyright statement attached to the Immigration Department website holds for the image gallery you just linked to (particularly [1] or [2]), it might be worth acquiring them to illustrate the article andor for Commons. -- saberwyn 11:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
The DIBP webiste also lists the Ocean Shield with the pre-fix 'ACV' here - [3]Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 11:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
The most recent edition of Jane's Fighting Ships says the change happened sometime in 2014. Am working on updating the article now. -- saberwyn 10:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Good find. It's funny that this wasn't officially announced. Nick-D (talk) 10:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Saberwyn: I've been able to fill in the gaps - the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service's annual report has a page on the ship, and various other details. Nick-D (talk) 23:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Used that source to add a little more detail. -- saberwyn 02:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ABFC Ocean Shield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

ABFC Ocean Shield as she is know known was not the Skandi Bergen but the Skandi Bergen II.

edit

ADV Ocean Protector, currently leased by the RAN is Skandi Bergen. ABFC Ocean Shield was Skandi Bergen II. There are subtle but distinct design changes (interior) between the two vessels. ABFC Ocean Shield retains the original 60T deck crane, whereas when Ocean Protector was in ABF (Customs) service she had her deck crane upgraded to 120T. ````Simon (Jun 2019) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.167.226.89 (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply