Talk:AEA Investors

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Otr500 in topic External links


Notes/References

edit

This appears to be mislabeled but another of example of highlighting every loss, or select loss, or wins is not what these entries are for.--BelBivDov (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AEA Investors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
There are Nineteen entries in a "References" section, that do not appear to be used in the article, so are "future sources" or "External links". There was even a 2013 "External links" tag in the section.
Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
  • WP:ELCITE: ...and access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.
Trimmed the section, removed the tag, and copied the links here should anyone wish to incorporate some into the article.

-- Otr500 (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply