Talk:AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2601:41:C401:6B80:3883:51F5:6FF:A992 in topic Designation
edit

Note: Much of this page is from sources, none posted copyrights on the page, but someone should verify they are not copyrighted somewhere, I could not confirm they were public domain. In particular I am unsure of the FAS site page and the USN Fact File page. I am new to this, perhaps someone can clarify this for me, or tell me what I need to look for on the source pages. --Imjustmatthew 01:04, 20 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Designation

edit

Is JSOW a missile or a guided/gliding bomb? The word 'weapon' is often used instead of the more specific 'missile' or 'bomb'. It has the AGM-prefix for 'Air-to-Ground Missile', yet it's catagorized as 'Air-dropped bombs' at the bottom of the page. So which is it? --Jigen III 11:08, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It is not powered so it is a glider bomb. A missile is " An object or weapon that is fired, thrown, dropped, or otherwise projected at a target; a projectile." so it can also be a missile. --Busterdog 03:12, 10 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
So all new guided bombs will now be grouped together with missiles (powered) with the AGM prefix? 205.174.22.27 03:08, 7 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
The same thing happened to the AGM-62 Walleye 2601:41:C401:6B80:3883:51F5:6FF:A992 (talk) 02:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I think AGM just means Air to Ground Missile. --Busterdog 02:57, 21 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Guided bombs are traditionally designated GBU, for Guided Bomb Unit. AGM is traditionally given to powered munitions. I don't understand the sudden inconsistancy. 205.174.22.28 06:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
According to [1], the designations AGM-154D and AGM-154E have been set aside for possible future powered versions of JSOW, so it looks like that possibility was in the program from the start. Riddley 03:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

The JSOW does not have a datalink (yet) so I am going to delete that.--Busterdog 03:10, 10 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

In fiction

edit

In the Tom Clancy Novel The Bear And The Dragon the weapon is used. Is that something worth noting?

Simplifying the lead

edit

How about simplifying the lead guys, I had to watch a youtube video to find out the JSOW is basically a bomb with wings, that travels a long distance so the pilots can fly away before getting in range of enemy AA. Ryan4314 (talk) 00:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

More info

edit

I did not really understood what was going on until I read this. How about adding a little more background? Thanks! (I would do it, but I have no clue about most military weapons and have little time for extensive research) Brusegadi (talk) 06:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Used by China?

edit

Seems unlikely. China is also not listed under Operators. 72.68.68.47 (talk) 13:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Republic of China (Taiwan), not People's Republic of China (Mainland China). BilCat (talk) 17:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply