Talk:AIDS Healthcare Foundation
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Avatar317 in topic Article development September 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AIDS Healthcare Foundation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article development September 2022
edit@Planetasha: Posted this in edit summary: Hi, edits are made with outside sources of a complete view of the org's work. Ballot measures and such have not been deleted. simply real services the organization provides have been added. Weird how some editor here intends to delete the fact that and AIDS organization operates clinics and health care centers. It's in the title of the organization. Any idea why Services keeps getting deleted? Better question, what's wrong with services to make them get deleted in the first place?
@Avatar317: You made the removal. Could you briefly comment to advance the conversation? Thanks. Bluerasberry (talk) 19:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Planetasha: Please stop trying to whitewash this article by removing the paragraphs in the lead which summarize the part of the article concerning their ballot initiatives (per WP:MOS the lead is supposed to summarize the article) and then adding poorly sourced content showing this organization's work in a positive manner. In Wikipedia, we describe organizations as characterized in what we call Reliable Sources: WP:RS.
- A statement you added: "Fighting for what’s right is one of AHF’s core values, which has led the organization into political battles for fair housing and drug prices." is not the way we write Wikipedia articles. We use Independent Sources WP:IS to give an objective view of the organization and its views.
- You are welcome to add positive content from RS's, as long as they are good sources: like the Los Angeles Times, for example: which I believe I previously mentioned in one of my reversions.
- Thanks! ---Avatar317(talk) 20:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)