Talk:ALCO RS-1

Untitled

Minneapolis & St. Louis original RS-1 numbers: 244, 744, 944, 1044, 1144, 645, 745, 845, 945, 146, 246, 346, 446, 546, 646, 746, 846, 946, 1046, 547, 948, 1048, 1148, 849, 949, 1049, 1149, 1249, 950, 1050, 1150, 1250, 751, 851, and 951. Data from The Diesel Shop Website. --SSW9389 17:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)--SSW9389 17:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by SSW9389 (talk • contribs)

carbody unit?

Surely this is a base unit, not a carbody unit? I am going by wikipedia's own definition of "carbody"

TJ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanyajane (talk • contribs) 04:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Infobox

Dorin, Patrick C. (1972). Chicago and North Western Power. Superior Publishing. p. 138. ISBN 0-87564-715-4. has C&NWRy drawings and spec sheets for their loco’s, that’s where most of this comes from. Sammy D III (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Last RS-1s

The last RS-1s built were on two different Alco shop orders. Shop order #S3283 covered 15 units that were built by Alco between January 1957 and May 1958. The units covered were NdeM #5639-5651 and GTW #1950-1951. The GTW units have the distinction of being the last RS-1s built for a U. S. railroad and the first Phase III RS-1s. Alco Shop order #S3299 was for the last dozen RS-1s built by Alco for the NdeM as #5652-5663. Shop order #3299 was built between May 1958 and March 1960. NdeM #5663 was the last RS-1 built in March 1960 ending the RS-1s long 19 year production run. All data from Extra 2200 South. --SSW9389 20:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

"Most locomotives"?

It says "most locomotives manufactured since then have followed this same basic configuration". I find this highly dubious...how many cab-and-hood locomotives do you see in Europe, diesel or otherwise? And most of the locomotives I see around here are Amtrak cab locomotives. I would call that a strongly American-centric statement, and not sure how accurate it is at that. if I knew how to tag it as dubious", I would..45Colt 20:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ALCO RS-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121030190813/http://www.railroadmichigan.com/shepherd.html to http://www.railroadmichigan.com/shepherd.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Remaining RS-1s

I happen to know that there's still ALCO RS-1 (0673) at the Danbury Railway Museum. Is there any evidence that other New Haven Railroad RS-1s still exist? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:33, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Number 0670 is owned by the Central New England Railroad, it's currently stored out of service in Scantic because of a missing part but there are long term plans to return it to service. It was in use for freight service as recently as 2010. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed Merger

I discovered today that a page exists for the ALCO RSC-1, of which only 4 were produced. I don't believe it was notable enough to justify its own page and should instead be merged into this article. The RSC-1 article is only two sentences and cannot stand as its own article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

double entry

Two different locomotives are listed to be the same:

Atlanta and St. Andrews Bay Railroad 905:

"Owned By Maryland and Delaware Railroad 22, Currently By Arkansas and Missouri Railroad 22"

Rutland Railroad 400:

"Owned By Maryland and Delaware Railroad 22, Currently Arkansas and Missouri Railroad 22"

Which one is correct? 217.248.114.131 (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)