Talk:AMD 800 chipset series

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Image of an AMD SR5690 northbridge available here (server version of 800-series) if anyone wants to add it to the page. I took the image myself and hereby state that it's free for any use/manipulation if so desired. I'm just not very familiar with Wikipedia formatting.

http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/computer/sr5690/sr5690_northbridgesm.jpg

67.60.237.211 (talk) 22:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC) GeoffReply

Information about 880G, 890GX and 890FX from ECS: http://www.ecs.com.tw/extra/vision/index.html 93.211.254.159 (talk) 02:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

There's no mention of the link speed of a PCI Express 2.0 lane: it could be either 2.5GT/s (compatible with PCIe 1.1) or 5.0GT/s. Some chipsets claim PCIe 2.0 / PCIe Gen2 support, but only at 2.5GT/s link speed : so a x16 port will have a bandwidth of 4GByte/s instead of 8GBytes. --80.12.80.40 (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on AMD 800 chipset series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply