Talk:AN/SEQ-3 Laser Weapon System

TALK discussion

Starting TALK (discussion) since any WP Article can be improved. (Looks great, currently.) -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 20:45, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

"The system, which can be installed on vehicles, shot down more than 30 drones in a recent test with a “100% success rate” said the CAEP statement." [1] -- AstroU (talk) 11:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Not to be confused with LAWs

I'm assuming this shouldnt redirect to the general disambiguation page on 'law', but rather the page on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems ("Military Robot")? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.51.153 (talk) 13:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

New NEWS today, for future editing

This is historic. It can go into the section, 'Deployment', or the Lede. (In my opinion.) -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Headline-1: U.S. Navy Deploys Its First Laser Weapon in the Persian Gulf

• http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-14/u-s-navy-deploys-its-first-laser-weapon-in-the-persian-gulf.html

QUOTE: "New York-based L-3 Communications Holdings LLC (LLL) and Pennsylvania State University’s Electro Optics Center have provided components and engineering support. The lessons from the one-year Ponce deployment will feed Navy laser development by industry teams led by BAE Systems Plc (BAESY), Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC) and Raytheon Co. (RTN), to field a more powerful weapon, possibly by 2021. Those efforts are separate from military laser designators to guide precision munitions, non-lethal crowd control devices or discontinued instruments intended to blind enemy electro-optical sensors." -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC) -- PS: FYI for future editing. PPS: "The U.S. Navy has deployed on a command ship in the Persian Gulf its first laser weapon capable of destroying a target." is the first sentence in this article.

Another article relating to that, "China unveils anti-drone laser weapon able to shoot down 'small aircraft' within 5 seconds" [2] -- AstroU (talk) 01:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

A defensive weapon? "The system, which can be installed on vehicles, shot down more than 30 drones in a recent test with a “100% success rate” said the CAEP statement. [3] -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 11:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Um, yes, it's a point defence system. Herr Gruber (talk) 23:14, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Laser Weapon System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100605232732/http://www.navsea.navy.mil/nswc/dahlgren/NEWS/LAWS/LAWS.aspx to http://www.navsea.navy.mil/nswc/dahlgren/NEWS/LAWS/LAWS.aspx
• Added archive https://archive.is/20140202182519/http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=1394 to http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=1394
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160522181019/http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2014/August/Pages/LasersCouldBecomeCostEffectiveMissileDefenseWeapons.aspx to http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2014/August/Pages/LasersCouldBecomeCostEffectiveMissileDefenseWeapons.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC)