Talk:ANZAC Mounted Division
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ANZAC Mounted Division article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
I added something to the article but it got removed. Why?
In all probability, what you added was unsourced information or information cited to an unreliable source; such information is usually removed quickly from any Wikipedia article due to relevant policies and guidelines here on site. Wikipedia articles require reliable sources for an independent verification of the facts presented, consequently any information added to an article without a reliable source is subject to removal from the article at any Wikipedian's discretion. I see information in the article that has no source. What should I do?
The sources used in this article are cited at the end of each paragraph (known on Wikipedia as "per paragraph citation") so a check of the numbered note at the end of the paragraph should provide the source for the information. If this does not work, then add {{cn}} to the suspicious information to draw attention to information that may not be cited by a source. Alternatively, you may add reliable sources to the uncited information by using ref tabs (<ref></ref>). If you do add a source to the article consider using one of the citation template(s) to ensure that you add all necessary information from your source to the article. Should ANZAC be capitalized in the article name?
The honest answer is "it depends". The sources given for the abbreviated name of the unit are not universally clear on the matter of capitalization, and as a result the article was moved to an all caps abbreviation in June 2010. The present consensus appears to be in favor of the retention of the all caps abbreviation for the article name, so if you wish to rename the article you will need to gain consensus for the new name by filing a move Request. Something in the lead section doesn't have a footnote. I'm going to put a {{fact}} tag on it right now.
This article (like many others) uses the approach of putting no citations in the lead section. This is because everything in the lead is also found in the body of the article along with its citation, as the lead functions as a summary of the entire article. This article appears to use the terms "Ottoman Empire" and/or "Turkey/Turkish" interchangeably. Why?
The issue of which of the two terms to use was a contentious one until a straw poll in November 2013 resulted in consensus to continue the use of "Turkey/Turkish" over "Ottoman" where context is clearly in favor of this term. Is it ok to change the terms "Ottoman Empire" or "Turkey/Turkish" in the article?
No. Current consensus Turkish Empire wording dispute is that the terms should be left as they are. If you wish to change the terms in the article you will need to gain a clear consensus to do so on the article's talk page first, otherwise the terms should be left as they are. Changes made to the terms in the article without first establishing a clear consensus for the change on the article's talk page or the main Military history Wikiproject talk page may be reverted by any Wikipedian in good standing until such time as the required clear consensus for the change is established and agreed upon by the community as a whole. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ANZAC Mounted Division. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023001138/http://www.army.mod.uk/artillery/23445.aspx to http://www.army.mod.uk/artillery/23445.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ANZAC Mounted Division. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131101062721/http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/AWMOHWW1/AIF/Vol7/ to http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/AWMOHWW1/AIF/Vol7/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Merging of History Sections
editI suggest that the merging of the formation and service histories alongside the selective merging of some of the battle sections. This would create better organisational structure and decrease the length of the table of contents. IronBattalion (talk) 01:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- G'day, if I was writing this from scratch, I would aim to work the formation and service histories in together, but given that this is a mature article I have been reluctant to do this. I could live with it either way. If you do decide to merge the sections, I'd ask that is done in a manner that maintains text-source cohesion and narrative flow. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support I can do the whole structural change with only one major change in content, that is to move a small portion of the Formation section to be apart of Gaza. However, since this is massive change of structure compared to the precedent, I'm opening up a discussion to ensure there will be no edit warring with the change due to, as you mentioned, it being a mature article IronBattalion (talk) 08:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)