Talk:ARP Quadra
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrument or component be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2007) |
Production Numbers
editAre there any records of of how many Quadras were made? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.78.13 (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
128k SRAM
editI severely doubt this number, particularly as it's missing the main unit. 128kB would've been outrageously expensive, even 16kB (=128 kBit) would already been hefty given the time of entering the market. Any Quadra expert out there to clarify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.163.46.212 (talk) 17:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. Since it only saved 16 settings, and not much data for each, even 1k would have been massive overkill. Perhaps they mean 128 bytes, which would have allowed for 64 bits of storage for each setting, which would probably have been more that enough? -- The Anome (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- I've found the service manual, which specifies that it was battery-backed CMOS RAM, but does not state the size, so I've removed the reference to the size of the of RAM. For amusement's sake, compare the spec of the modern ESP8266, which comes with 64+96 kB of RAM and 1 MB of flash, essentially as incidentals, in a sub-$2 unit that is not even intended to be a general purpose computer. -- The Anome (talk) 13:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ARP Quadra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060523090938/http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Apr02/articles/retrozone0402.asp to http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Apr02/articles/retrozone0402.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)