Talk:AS9100

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Uziel302 in topic References not supporting claim

AS9100 list of registered companies

edit

AS9100 list of registered companies 146.145.185.146 20:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC) dely@neapco.comReply


This would be nearly impossible, since these types of certifications have to be renewed and are not verifiable by the general public. The list would change too often to be a good reference here. If you insist this information is needed, I suggest you make a seperate "list" article to avoid confusing this entry. stuston (talk) 14:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

ISO9000 v ISO9001

edit

ISO9000:2005 "Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary".

ISO9001:2008 "Quality management systems - Requirements".

The article quotes ISO9000 - is this correct or should it be ISO9001:2008 (or something else?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.133.0.13 (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AS9100. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

References not supporting claim

edit

"Major aerospace manufacturers and suppliers worldwide require compliance and/or registration to AS9100 as a condition of doing business with them."

The two references don't support this claim.Uziel302 (talk) 16:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply