Talk:ASARCO

An image on this page may be deleted

This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:ASARCOlogo.svg, found on ASARCO, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 14:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Image?

The image reading: "ASARCO Mission Mine" is of an artifact; an ancient lift for old fashioned deep mines. It does not represent modern open-pit mining, used exclusively by ASARCO and most others since 1957. The picture of the Garfield, Utah mine is much more representative of it. I have, and can get, better images of the exterior and interior of the modern mine.68.231.184.217 (talk) 21:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 20:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

ASARCO → Asarco – Common name. The first 20 Google News results use "Asarco" except for these: [1] [2] [3] Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 22:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

• Support, WP:CAPS and the WP:MOSTM also support this move.--70.49.82.84 (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
• Support for the same reasons mentioned above. Dicklyon (talk) 00:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Missing Superfund Sites

Article currently mentions 20 superfund sites and then lists 10 of them. As noted at the EPA site there are actually 26. In particular no mention is made of the five sites in Missouri, for which the settlements totaled $63M. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.128.122.44 (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I'd propose changing the introductory paragraph to read "... over 20 superfund sites .... These include:" followed by the current list of 10. Msramming (talk) 20:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asarco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927000622/http://www.omahapubliclibrary.org/earlyomaha/buildings/american_smelting.html to http://www.omahapubliclibrary.org/earlyomaha/buildings/american_smelting.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asarco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061110075538/http://www.uswaternews.com/archives/arcrights/9cheemp5.html to http://www.uswaternews.com/archives/arcrights/9cheemp5.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Environmental section suggesting an author bias?

On 9 April 2019 several changes were made to this page from IP Address: 2600:6C64:7980:485:12:8886:FBCE:F201 to "more accurately describe ASARCO." With this change included several references of environmental, health and litigation issues added to several lines in the opening statements of this article.

While I believe it is important, especially with the pollution causing industries to report on the environmental issues; the tone of voice in this update comes across very charged and tries to paint ASARCO as if it was in the business of creating environmental disaster. I will try and update the article to reflect a more neutral tone, and recommend keeping an eye out against such emotionally charged writing in the future. Furthermore, the section improperly cited an Amazon.com page for a book, rather than citing the book itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xboxtravis7992 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Corpus Christi and Nueva Rosita, Coahuila, Mex

I have seen no reference to the plants in Corpus Christi, Texas and Neuva Rosita, Coahuila, Mexico. Both of these plants were enormous and were major polluters in there respective areas. 2001:5B0:4DC8:C998:B80A:F904:C0BB:8E52 (talk) 21:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)