Talk:ASCI White

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the `\|unref=` parameter from this template.

TeraFlops

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There seems to be a little bit of a discrepancy in information regarding the ASCI White performance in TeraFlops.

The main ASCI White article claims its theoretical performance of 12.3 teraFLOPS was not achieved in the widely accepted LINPACK tests.

If we go to the next page in the record-holders sequence, the NEC Earth Simulator navigation menu lists the ASCI White at 7.226 teraflops

The previous record-holder ASCI Red also has a few discrepancies. The ASCI White page claims 2.379 teraflops. The ASCI Red sidebar lists 1.3 teraflops (peak)[1], but the "First to TFLOPS" section mentions a range of different numbers (after various upgrades): 1.06 TFLOPS, 2.38 TFLOPS, 1.6 TFLOPS, 3.1 TFLOPS.

I am looking for advice (or to delegate), how we can improve the consistency of information between pages, menus, and wiki sections.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.240.144 (talk) 03:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic