This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ASM-135 ASAT article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on ASM-135 ASAT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070131173354/http://www.vought.com:80/heritage/products/html/asat.html to http://www.vought.com/heritage/products/html/asat.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080202163409/http://www.astronautix.com:80/stages/altair3.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/stages/altair3.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071204202633/http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/space_weapons/a-history-of-asat-programs.html to http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/space_weapons/a-history-of-asat-programs.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ASM-135 ASAT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080103174537/http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/bolorion.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/bolorion.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Development
editA United States Army Nike Zeus missile armed with a nuclear warhead destroyed an orbiting satellite in May 1963. This does not look right. Sources talk about successful intercept (i.e. passing sufficiently close that a nuclear warhead would have destroyed the satellite), not actual destruction of satellite. See for example [1]. JustSomePics (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Absolutely – since that source isn't entirely clear ("modified", "intercepted") I've adjusted the wording accordingly. --Zac67 (talk) 07:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)