Talk:ATEC v.o.s.

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ATEC v.o.s. article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

New Atec Faeta NG

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The new Faeta NG has the same model number as the Faeta, but the changes are quite visible. Tail is totally different, cabin is larger and construction methods are different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redge76 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

If it is enough of a new model for a whole new article then I think the case is best made by writing the article. I don't have any third party refs for the NG model, or I would tackle it myself. - Ahunt (talk) 16:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

There is no reference because it's a new model. There is only 3/4 built so far. On ATEC website it's 2 different pages. 321 http://www.atecaircraft.eu/en/planes/faeta/ and 321 NG http://www.atecaircraft.eu/en/planes/atec-321-faeta-ng/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redge76 (talk • contribs) 11:48, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

It would have been better if the manufacturer gave it a new model number, but perhaps they are trying to capitalize on the name recognition? I'll put it back in the article and when a third party source describes it then we can have an article on it. - Ahunt (talk) 14:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ATEC v.o.s.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130516004527/http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/gen_av/light_sport/media/SLSA_Directory.xls to http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/gen_av/light_sport/media/SLSA_Directory.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic