Wikipedia

Talk:ATM usage fees

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 80.41.95.231 in topic Spain
Learn more about this page

Spain

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This section is almost entirely fiction or wishful thinking, unsupported by any evidence whatsoever. I would delete, but you'd simply see vandalism and restore it. Please review and think about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.95.231 (talk) 11:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ISO?

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

What's an ISO on this page? Independent sales organization? Someone who knows, please explain in the article and provide the hyperlink. – gpvos (talk) 20:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I was just wondering the same thing. In response, I've added the clean-up template to the article. (See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Acronyms_and_abbreviations). --Miken2005 05:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Someone removed the clean-up template, apparently without first checking here to see why it was there, so I've put up the abbreviations template instead. --Miken2005 23:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Before surcharging was allowed

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the US section, the article quotes: "Before surcharging was allowed in 1996, ATM fees averaged $1.01 USD nationally, according to a 2001 report ..." But what does that mean? Is there a difference between surcharges and fees? A clarification would help. Asiir 12:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bangladesh article - to be removed?

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The paragraph on Bangladesh does not deal at all with ATM usage fees in Bangladesh - it only promotes a certain bank (the Dutch-Bangla Bank) and talks about the services provided to its customers, as if other banks did not exist. Its language is also barely understandable. If no valid objection or correction is made I will remove the Bangladesh paragraph altogether.

Kacper (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Outdated and misleading

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rules are being introduced that will force banks to levy equal fees for customers of all banks in the European Union. This may mean national fees become higher. See Single Euro Payments Area.

Now as the article immediately after that points out, these rules are already in effect for many years. And the conclusion that national fees could become higher is totally unsubstantiated (or at least very misleading) as the EU regulation only governs payments between EU member states but not the fees charged to domestic customers, so the EU can only control the fee when you are using a ATM in another EU country than your bank resides in. This has led to the curious situation that in fact the fee can be higher for domestic use, but this is as pointed out not in any way due to the EU regulation but vice-versa the EU regulation had forced the banks to take lower prices from foreign (EU) customers. -- 62.143.127.38 (talk) 21:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on ATM usage fees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on ATM usage fees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on ATM usage fees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on ATM usage fees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:ATM_usage_fees&oldid=1197162495"