Is Atmel really the ONLY user of AVR32?

edit

According to this article: "The AVR32 architecture is solely used in Atmel's own products.". Is this true? I mean, aside from devboards from other manufacturers ofcourse. It seems unlikely that NOONE has used the processor in, what, 2-3 years? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.173.50.97 (talk) 23:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

In this context, "architecture" refers to the instruction set architecture and "product" refers to processors. That is, no other manufacturer uses the AVR32 instruction set in their processors. --Imroy (talk) 09:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Seems that really no one other the ATMEL used these processors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.127.35 (talk) 06:28, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Products

edit

It would be great if there was a list of products which use any of the AVR32 processors (or are there any?) Like the ARM_architecture page has. 69.108.2.230 (talk) 05:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 31 external links on AVR32. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on AVR32. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Instruction set vs. microarchitecture

edit