This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As this article now reads, it discusses the "Preface" more extensively than the entire book. In other words, as the article now stands it already is about the "Preface". Therefore, I propose that this page be renamed Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (after some adjustments and with just a small amount of revision, and some additional material, sources and citations). Of course, this would probably be a more useful aticle to have on Wikipedia anyway. Afterall, the "Preface" is more famous than the rest of the book: ie., for the very reasons that are already pointed to and clarified (somewhat) in the article. What do you think? Shall we rename it? Christian Roess (talk) 03:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
