This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Bowling Solitaire was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 04 January 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into A Gamut of Games on 02:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history. |
Poke (game) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 04 January 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into A Gamut of Games on 02:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history. |
The No Game was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 December 2008 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into A Gamut of Games on 17:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history. |
Three templates
editNPOV
editI don't see any NPOV problem with this article. Perhaps it has been fixed? Jdavidb 15:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
References
editThe article links to the book. Do we need documentation for the claim that it's a standard study text for abstract game design? Sounds somewhat plausible to me, but if it's true I'm sure we could dig it up. Jdavidb 15:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic
editI disagree. I think it is quite encyclopedic. There are lots of books with articles in Wikipedia. If this book is a significant text in a field, it belongs here. Wiki is not paper; we will not run out of room because of its inclusion. Jdavidb 15:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Bowling Solitaire
editI started the page for bowling Solitaire.--Sonjaaa 10:01, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
PDF Gamut of games
editit's still in the market this book?
isn't this just a list? More 02:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by SlamMeMore (talk • contribs)