This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 10 April 2023. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citingyour sources.Unreferenced articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesTemplate:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesUnreferenced articles articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is a very badly written article right now. The use of the second-person is awkward and unconventional, and the tone is condescending and appears to be essentially written from a shameless position of personal opinion and reaction to the novel. The English is clumsy, and I wonder if it was written by somebody with limited skills in this language. The entire stub leaves one wondering if it was written by a secondary school student who has been set the novel to read as a class text.
Could somebody with real expertise in English literature, and with knowledge of this writer (and this work in particular)please re-write this article with something useful and objectively informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.238.2.116 (talk) 04:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
