Talk:A Jewish Wedding
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 82.176.221.176 in topic It does NOT portray the artist's daughter
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from A Jewish Wedding appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 February 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
( )
A Jewish Wedding
- ... that the subject of A Jewish Wedding was said to be the marriage ceremony of the artist's daughter? Source: thought to depict the wedding of his daughter and Cohen Tervaert and the artist's daughter Mathilda Anna Israels
- ALT1: ... that the 1903 painting A Jewish Wedding is a portrayal of a traditional Jewish wedding scene with the bride and groom under a tallit? Source: standing underneath what looks like a woven blanket. This is, in fact, known as a chuppah, which is a four-columned canopy used to cover the kallah and chatan to create a sanctified space. and Both are covered by a tallit, which serves as a huppa (wedding canopy)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Laura Bergt
Created by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 14:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC).
Article is neutral, meets the required length, and is sufficiently referenced—created on 11 January, the day before this nomination. Hooks are succinct, neutral, and reliably sourced; they're not especially catchy, but I think you've picked the best you could. Image is suitably licensed and fits incredibly well alongside the hook. QPQ looks good. This is good to go! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
It does NOT portray the artist's daughter
editAs per the Dutch Wiki-page, and well-sourced to Marjan van Heteren, Guido Jansen, Ronald de Leeuw: Poëzie der werkelijkheid; Nederlandse schilders van de negentiende eeuw. Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, Waanders Uitgevers, 2000, blz. 168-169: "Israels himself indicated in 1909 that he did not paint a specific couple, but random people.", the original quote in Dutch: "Israëls zelf heeft in 1909 echter aangegeven dat hij geen specifiek echtpaar heeft geschilderd, maar willekeurige personen." 82.176.221.176 (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)