Talk:A Literary Nightmare

Latest comment: 16 years ago by 66.20.170.4 in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit

The article says, "The story is significant in that it is a fairly accurate description of a meme". This is already in the "Jingle as a meme" section and really doesn't belong in the lead, since memes are an unproven idea, either protoscience or pseudoscience (personally I think the latter, since they are not measurable but treated as scientific, and serve largely as a platform for reductionist ideas by a controversial scientist.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.20.170.4 (talk) 13:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply