Talk:A Logician Devil

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

untitled

edit

I'm not sure why this would go through speedy deletion unless I cited references incorrectly. If anyone could help out, I would appreciate it. Xtimgx (talk) 17:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

I believe this painting (under the simple name of Lucifer) is notable due to coverage.

  • Dante on View by Antonella Braida, Luisa Calè. p.150
  • [1]
  • Living with art by William McCarter, Rita Gilber p.83
  • There are several book hits for art books that discuss this work. The article needs to add these sources for verifiability, but the topic does meet the requirments Mrathel (talk) 08:41, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Logician Devil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply