Talk:A Man and a Woman (song)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Cuchullain in topic Requested move
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no move. Moving this redirect serves no pressing purpose. If in the future someone decides to create a disambiguation page at A Man and a Woman (song), the redirect can be moved at that point to preserve the page history.Cúchullain t/c 16:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
A Man and a Woman (song) → A Man and a Woman (U2 song) – The current title is widely associated with the theme from eponymous film, much more so than the song it redirects to. Relisted. Favonian (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC). Hearfourmewesique (talk) 17:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose - the U2 is more famous. Unreal7 (talk) 19:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - sounds a bit bogus, care to WP:PROVEIT? Hearfourmewesique (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Support, multiple song topics covered by Wikipedia, WP:NCM specifies to use the artist's name in the qualified title (regardless of the relative famousness of them). Relative famousness would only be a factor if one of them were the primary topic for the base name title. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Another comment by nominator - regardless of what is more famous, we should present readers with all possible options for all pieces of music associated with the title. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Someone seems to have changed this page into a redirect while the RM was in progress. Jafeluv (talk) 13:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Huh? Am I missing something? It looks like it's been a redirect since 2007. Why do we need to move a redirect? Jenks24 (talk) 09:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Umm, yeah, on second look that's right Moving a redirect certainly makes no sense, so this can probably be closed. Anyone can convert this into a disambiguation page if desired. Jafeluv (talk) 12:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Moving a redirect maintains its history. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:56, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Umm, yeah, on second look that's right Moving a redirect certainly makes no sense, so this can probably be closed. Anyone can convert this into a disambiguation page if desired. Jafeluv (talk) 12:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.