Talk:A Passion for Churches

A Passion for Churches has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 8, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 12, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the 1974 BBC documentary A Passion for Churches, Poet Laureate John Betjeman compares the likeness of church architect Ninian Comper to Colonel Harland Sanders?

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:A Passion for Churches/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Super Mario Man 21:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I noticed that this article had been in the queue for almost two months - I'll have a look at it. Super Mario Man 21:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Bob. Given that the topic seems to be a fairly obscure one, this is a strong article. I believe that it meets all the relevant standards and, as such, will pass it now - I can think of no compelling reason for putting it in hold. As with A Ghost Story for Christmas, I've tweaked the prose in places, added a few links and reviewed the categories. Although much of the content is reliant on the DVD notes (a primary source) for its citations, that's probably rather difficult to avoid.

If I had to make a suggestion, I would recommend expanding the lead section slightly to provide a little more background on the production and reception, but what is currently presented in the introduction seems perfectly acceptable to me as far as GA reviewing is concerned. Certainly the article appears to be sufficiently comprehensive - I especially like the production section. And, I have to say - "Early location-scouting proved fruitful, and the production was bolstered by a meeting with Bishop Wood in March 1974, during which the bishop gave the production his blessing" - a suitably topical note to end that paragraph!

Another excellent effort here - well done. Regards, Super Mario Man 23:26, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic