Talk:A Patriot's Act

"Critically acclaimed"

I'm not sure that one fellow author (for whose review a better source is needed), one apparently-non=notable magazine, and a guest reviewer at [[Midwest Book Review] giving the book positive reviews, taken together, quite translates to "critically acclaimed" — that phrasing implies that multiple notable critics have reviewed the book and the majority have given it high praise. If there are reviews by critics working with magazines or other publishers whom readers are likely to have heard of, reference to those reviews should be added to the article. Otherwise i think the language should be toned down, perhaps to "A Patriot's Act has received positive reviews." —GrammarFascist _contribs^talk 10:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)