Talk:A Rose for Ecclesiastes

Removing link to full text due to copyright violation

Is the full text link in the public Domain, I think not. This should be removed. Sethwoodworth 19:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, and zapped.--SarekOfVulcan 00:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Spoiler

Sheez, give away the whole plot in describing the story. Its not that long a story, and the turns it takes I think are much better encountered without a roadmap... Aapold (talk) 21:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bokfsf.jpg

The image Image:Bokfsf.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Rose for Ecclesiastes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080118071839/http://www.locusmag.com:80/SFAwards/Db/Hugo1964.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Hugo1964.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 1 October 2016 (UTC)