Talk:A Tolkien Compass

A Tolkien Compass has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 1, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Middle-earth Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

GA Review

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:A Tolkien Compass/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 15:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )

3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Will do. AryKun (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

You don't need to mention "posthumously", since both books were publishes after Tolkien's death.
- Removed.

"The literary establishment was largely hostile to the book" You should mention that reception was only initially hostile.
- Added.

"Hobbits" should be capitalized.
- Done.

Images are appropriately used and properly licensed.
- Noted.

The link for "'Rings' comes full circle". USA Today. is broken.
- Archived.

Spotchecks:
- Ref 8: "In Memoriam: Jared Lobdell". Mythlore. 38 (1). verifies all claims made.
- Nagy, Gergely (2005). "The Road to Middle-earth, Revised and Expanded Edition (review)". Tolkien Studies. Project Muse. 2 (1): 258–261. Verifies all claims made.
- Bratman, David (2006). "The Year's Work in Tolkien Studies 2003". Tolkien Studies. Project Muse. 3 (1): 241–265. Verifies all claims made.
- Noted.

That's all I have. AryKun (talk) 08:25, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, will be passing. AryKun (talk) 10:47, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic