Talk:A Very Royal Scandal
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Barry Wom in topic Related shows
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Related shows
edit@Barry Wom: How they are listed on Amazon is irrelevant
. Does this mean that I should just assume that you know better than the actual streaming service and the production company whether these shows are related or not? Keivan.fTalk 16:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- The series is described in the article body (correctly, in my opinion) as a "spiritual successor" to the previous shows. All three share a production company and have similar titles, but have nothing else in common. The "Related" field in the infobox is for "remakes, spin-offs [and] adaptations for different audiences". None of these criteria apply in this case. Barry Wom (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- The same thing could be said about seasons 1 and 2 of Feud. Totally unrelated stories, yet part of the same series. There are other examples as well. I don't know why we're making an exception out of this one. Keivan.fTalk 19:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neither of the Feud articles use the "Related" field in the infobox. Which is correct, as the second series is neither a spin-off nor a remake nor an adaptation. The fact that the same production company made all three "Scandal" shows is already spelled out in the article bodies. There's no reason to add the information to an unsuitable field in an already overstuffed infobox. Barry Wom (talk) 11:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- The same thing could be said about seasons 1 and 2 of Feud. Totally unrelated stories, yet part of the same series. There are other examples as well. I don't know why we're making an exception out of this one. Keivan.fTalk 19:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)