Talk:A Walk to Remember (novel)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Assessment

edit

For anyone editing this article, I do feel that it is very close to a C-class article. Ultimately the lack of a plot summary was too large of a hole. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Plot summary

edit

The plot summary resembles more of the film, not the book itself. Can somebody change the plot to resemble the book ASAP? I'll move the plot summary to the film adaptation.  dXterminator017 | (discuss)  07:25, 1 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind. Searched through history. Article was reverted back with the plot summary of the book.  dXterminator017 | (discuss)  07:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on A Walk to Remember (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply