This article was nominated for deletion on 13 February 2023. The result of the discussion was soft keep.
A fact from A drive into deep left field by Castellanos appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago14 comments5 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: As the opening day of the 2023 MLB season is March 30 and since this article is about a meme, I feel like this would be a good candidate for an April 1 hook.
Overall: The blockquote might be somewhat long, and leads to Earwig flagging this article, but I've trimmed it a bit and if it's problematic I can trim it even further. I have slightly altered the hook to make it make some more sense. Do note the request to keep this hook for April 1. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 01:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
oh, theleekycauldron, this idea is hilarious! incidentally, i recently proposed a short hook that, in retrospect, may work better as an april fools' hook, as it may be considered slightly misleading, and also contains a link revealing part of the joke, as is commonly done with april fools' hooks. i tried combining the two hooks, and thought the following two possibilities seemed decent.
I'm ok with it if it means we can run the King Bataha Santiago hook twice – once as a standalone in February, the second time as a mashup on April Fool's Day. (Otherwise it feels disrespectful to the Bataha Santiago article somehow. But I genuinely appreciate the out-of-the-box thinking and attempts at humour.) Cielquiparle (talk) 06:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
i had figured that we should probably get consent from the nominator of the outer hook, which is why i had pinged Nyan, though at the time, i admittedly hadn't considered that interrupting the hook may be considered disrespectful to the subject of the article, who is a hero in north sulawesi, so thanks for pointing that out, Cielquiparle.if consent is an issue, an article i recently wrote has dyk potential, but i hadn't been planning to nominate it for dyk, so i could get that article up to dyk standards and then allow the hook to be used in however manner would be considered best to deliver the joke, including gutting the crux of the hook, or returning the hook back to the batch of serious hooks if we come across another more suitable hook before april fools' day. i won't mind the hook being run only once; i wasn't expecting to nominate it at all. the article is about a metro station, so i am assuming that disrespect is less of an issue. for reference, the hook i am planning to propose looks something like "... that newly opened Moscow Metro station Maryina Roshcha's four escalators are the longest in Moscow?", which should be short enough to work with. dying (talk) 11:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC) [copyedited. dying (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)]Reply
theleekycauldron, Bait30, and John M Wolfson, my hook has been approved. please feel free to do what you think is best with it, or not use it at all.i was thinking it would be funny if we could say something like "... that Mayor Sergey Sobyanin is proud of the escalators in Maryina Roshcha, which he thinks are the longest in the Moscow Metro—as there's a drive into deep left field by Castellanos, that will be a home run. And so that will make it a 4–0 ballgame.", but i think i used too much synth for this to work. (sobyanin does actually state that the escalators are the longest in the moscow metro, but the source doesn't explicitly mention that he thinks this or is proud of them, even though it is strongly implied.) i thought i might mention this idea in case we eventually come across another hook that can be used in this manner. dying (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Bait30: yeah, I never really came across the meme format in the wild, so I assumed it'd be in the middle, as that's where it is in the actual apology text. I'll keep that in mind when putting together the final hook. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 10:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
@Bait30 Please explain the importance of the Planet Fitness billboard and the slogan it displayed with regards to this article. It is currently very out-of-place. If it is to comment on the irony, it should be mentioned in the reactions section, as that would be entirely subjective and not a crucial detail of the subject of the article, but rather an analysis of it. GabberFlasted (talk) 12:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Some reliable sources mention the irony, but some just mention the judg(e)ment free zone billboard when simply recapping the incident. It's being used in the article simply as a verifiable fact that can be corroborated by multiple RS. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls?21:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm not seeing the utility of including it the article in it's current location. Outside of the implied irony, the detail is superfluous. I agree, if we are to mention the irony, it should be moved to the reactions section. . - Skipple☎22:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I respectfully disagree, but I did write it so maybe I'm biased. I would say that I definitely don't think it should be deleted, but if anyone is inclined to move it, it would be a better fit for the Impact/Copypasta section rather than the Reactions section. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls?22:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply