Talk:Aaron Peskin

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Thenightaway in topic Recent edit warring on this page

Untitled

edit

This entire article is lifted from the subject's campaign site. It obviously has a multitude of problems. I'm too new here to know where to start, but my gut says just "delete it". -- Jpgordon 05:32, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

New language

edit

I've gone ahead and added some new language.

Inaccurate

edit

The 2006 North Beach Jazz Festival was not canceled. The organizers threatened to cancel it in order to exert their influence over the Rec and Park Department. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.123.180.231 (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

North Beach Jazz Festival is not 52 years old, and it was not canceled... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs6i3CBdIAY&feature=related It was nearly canceled. The North Beach Festival is the one that's about 52 years old. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.80.3.5 (talk) 00:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

701 Lombard Street is not across from Washington Square Park. It is the location of the North Beach library, next to Joe DiMaggio Park. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.212.36.2 (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Stale & Inconsistant

edit

Needs Updating Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 00:22, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Only one minor point is inconsistent politicians are usually stale.Tobynixon (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.examiner.com/a-498228~Re_elected_board_chief__Peskin_sets_ambitious_agenda.html
    Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:08, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Aaron Peskin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aaron Peskin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit warring on this page

edit

@Thenightaway, @Californiaknowshowtoparty, and @SFHistorian1850: Please discuss here rather than continuing to edit war. Funcrunch (talk) 22:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The editors SFHistorian1850 and Californiaknowshowtoparty have removed massive amounts of RS content with what seems an intent to promote the subject and whitewash. They are single-purpose editors and their edit summaries are deceptive and misleading (they frequently mischaracterize what they are doing and they frequently describe their edits as minor). There is no policy-based reason for removing RS content about Peskin's student activism and replacing it with unsourced text that says something completely different. There's also no policy-based reason to remove RS content on the properties that Peskin owns in the personal life section. Thenightaway (talk) 22:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply