This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greenland, a WikiProject related to the nation of Greenland. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.GreenlandWikipedia:WikiProject GreenlandTemplate:WikiProject GreenlandGreenland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This draft was previously declined on the basis that the Nipisat Island article already contains information about the heritage site, so a split request should be initiated. I don't think this is valid for a few reasons. For one, I am quite confident that we've always considered world heritage sites to be independently notable; furthermore, as pointed out by the draft creator, the heritage site encompasses locations other than Nipisat Island; and this article is longer than the Nipisat article so merging it there would create issues with undue weight. Spicy (talk) 16:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Spicy, a split request could have still been initiated and agreed that it can be its own article. It's not hard to do. Just that the island article had the infobox for UNESCO site already so it wouldn't make sense to have it listed in more than one article like that. I removed it from Nipisat Island so no need to do any further stuff regarding a split request. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
