Talk:Abd al-Rahman ibn Khalid
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abd al-Rahman ibn Khalid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Abd al-Rahman ibn Khalid be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editThis entire article seems to have been cut-pasted from a Shi'a-centric website. I wouldn't go as far as saying that it is of dubious accuracy, but it definitely infringes the NPOV policy of Wikipedia.
But that's the least of the issues here. This is supposed to be an article about Abdulrahman bin Khalid, son of Khalid bin Al-waleed. You expect an article about the life and deeds of the man. What you have instead is a (probably plagiarized) paragraph about how Muawiya purportedly killed the man (itself not factual but rather a Shi'a repeated accusation).
I suggest completely scrapping the text and keeping it as a stub for now, until someone has the time to write an actual factual NPOV article about the man.
-IBaghdadi
Things are not false by default only because a shia cites it. If you feel its false, please give a contradictory source, personal pov does not count. As for the article, its a stub, feel free to contribute to it. --Striver 01:27, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
This stub also seems very shady to me... Also, you don't learn much about Abd al rahman at all, is this stub even necessary?? Shias are necessarily biased (it is part of their faith) towards Mu'awiyah and the entire family of Umayyah, and some allegations have very little basis in hisotry books. Even if there is not much to contradict it, that does not mean it is accurate. It is portrayed as fact (poisoning) in this stub. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muawiya_I
Islami, al Istiab is a Sunni source, stop claiming its a Shi'a story. --Striver 00:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Abdulreman ibn Khalid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050205065530/http://www.answering-ansar.org:80/answers/yazeed/en/chap2.php to http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/yazeed/en/chap2.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)