This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Sandstein, I disagree with your "undo" of the structure that I proposed. Could you please add one? You've done a great job starting the article and adding some information about one of the most recent and important celebrities and journalists killed during the Somali civil war. However, no structure (as it was and now is) is more "unhelpful" because visually there is no way for a reader to enter. If you didn't like the structure I used, then that's ok with me, but could you at least take a stab at making one for yourself and ordering the information as you would like! Another reason for me to return to the article later would be that the article as it stands now lacks a notability statement, which would make it easy for somebody to propose deletion. There are many other sources about him, too. I would like to see this article move beyond stub status. But I like the direction you are going so far and please keep up the good work. I totally understand if you're in the process of developing the article further and need some time to do that. I don't know where you are in the process. So if I write about things that you're already planning to do, my apologies to you. Thank you for all your efforts and contributions. I'll check back later. Danke, Crtew (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
I saw that you added the category from the previous undo move, but would you please also restore the see also section? Thank you, Crtew (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply