Talk:Abdul Amir al-Jamri

Abdul Amir al-Jamri has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 24, 2013. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Abdul Amir al-Jamri appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Shia cleric Abdul Amir al-Jamri succeeded in uniting Shia, secular and liberal forces during the 1990s uprising in Bahrain?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abdul Amir al-Jamri.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Bahrain Mid‑importance

	Bahrain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bahrain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Kingdom of Bahrain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BahrainWikipedia:WikiProject BahrainTemplate:WikiProject BahrainBahrain
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birth date

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a mistake in most reliable sources regarding al-Jamri's birth date. Most of them give it as 1937 without specifying month or day. I found several sources giving his full birth date in Hijri calendar (28-12-1356)[1]. When converting it to the Gregorian calendar it becomes 1 March 1938. I used this website to convert it. The website is accurate as I've tried my birthday as well as another person's. More info is appreciated. Mohamed CJ (talk) 19:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago13 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Abdul Amir al-Jamri/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 21:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC) Oh, you've waited quite a long time for this one. If I may, I'll have a go at reviewing it, unless there are any objections ? Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

No objections at all. Thank you for taking it and I'm looking forward to your review :) Mohamed CJ (talk) 22:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Generally the prose is very good, particularly for someone for whom English is not their first language. There are a few tweaks that could improve it however; for instance, there is no need for the "the-then" which appears twice in the introduction. The reader is already aware that past events are being described, so this wording is largely superfluous. Also in the introduction, we link to Islamism and leftism, so why not liberalism too ? Where you state "A new emir, Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa had succeeded his father. The new emir proposed a reform plan..." you could easily cut it down to "The new emir, Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, proposed a reform plan..." A few other changes could be made to this paragraph, for instance there is no need for "now-king". Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply In the "Early Life" section, the proper use of English would be to use "a Quranic teacher" and then "taught him the Quran". Rather than "After finishing formal education in Budaiya primary school,[2] al-Jamri, now 12 years old..." try "Al-Jamri finished formal education at Budaiya primary school when he was 12, before becoming...". Change "he left Bahrain to Iraq" to "he left Bahrain for Iraq". In the western world, religious studies is a term used to refer to the academic study of religious beliefs generally, so here it would probably be better to use the term "Islamic studies", to clarify that al-Jamri was only studying Islam, and not other world religions. The name of Al Wasat should be italicised, to fit with Wikipedia's policies. Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply Change "Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq who believed that the prefix "Abdul" should be only used with the name of god" to "Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq, where it was believed that the prefix "Abdul" should only be used with the name of God." When discussing monotheistic conceptions of deity, such as those found in Islam or Christianity, "God" is always capitalised as a sign of respect. You reference Ba'athism, but it would probably be good to be a little clearer on the issue; try "Iraq's Ba'athist regime of Saddam Hussein" perhaps ? Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply Problems like this persist throughout the text, and I considered it best to make the rest of the changes myself; I hope you do not mind. Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply I'm humbled by your words. Looking at your edits to the article, I think I should have submitted it for copy editing first. I've implemented the changes suggested. Mohamed CJ (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	There is a bit of an issue with the layout of the page; it has largely been arranged thematically, rather than chronologically. I would advise that it is rearranged so that the events are stated in the chronological order in which they happened, thereby merging the "Early Life" and "Religious studies" sections. Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply Done. Mohamed CJ (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No images are currently used; this will have to be rectified. A Google image search has revealed a few images that we could use, so long as we include the correct Fair Use rationale. Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply Perhaps we could also include some images of the protests and/or the Emir ? Midnightblueowl (talk) 23:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply I have actually asked Mansoor al-Jamri to provide images for his father. He uploaded some to flickr and I've now added one of them to the article. I've also added another image for the Parliament. As for the 1990s protests, I don't know about any free images available and I'm not sure an image for the Emir is appropriate for the article. There is one image when the king visited him which I think I can get freely published, but it's not really clear. Mohamed CJ (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Now that the corrections have been made, this one's a clear pass. Well done Mohamad! Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Abdul Amir al-Jamri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic