| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abersoch article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Problems with editors? use this place instead of their userpage
editstarting a dialogue relating to pages should only really stay in their relevant page's talk, by going to their personal pages does nothing but antagonise editors who wish to help add to wiki pages, so please stick to this talk if you have any queries or issues relating tothe 'Abersoch' page, diolch Hogyncymru (talk) 22:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
editI think this page needs rewriting, for it seems to be an advertisement page for Abersoch; advertising is not allowed on Wikipedia.
"English Immigration"
editOh dear, it looks like the Plaid Cymru nationalists have had a bash at this page. Please could someone with a couple of brain cells re-write this article … —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.191.50 (talk) 20:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Any POV should remain as so, this is not an area to discuss theories. Hogyncymru (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Recent edits
edit{text originality at User talk:Hogyncymru and put here at their prompting.)
I know that feelings run high and that the closure of the school was a big blow to the community, but...... the standards of Wikipedia don't change because of that. I have removed the obvious POV and unsourced contentious statements. You might want to consider removing the image of a roundabout unless there is a good source that unequivocally links the passage of chalets to Abersoch with the removal of the roundabout. Thanks Velella Velella Talk 22:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't know that having businesses without bilingual signage in their establishment was POV rather than fact? Hogyncymru (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Neither the original "The Guardian" article, nor the opinion piece in the "Daily Post" about that article, mentioned anything about mono-lingual signs, so, yes, it is POV. Velella Velella Talk 23:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- So if 1000 people walked into a shop and saw exactly the same, would it be classed as 'POV'? Hogyncymru (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia remains based on what reliable and independent sources say. Velella Velella Talk 23:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- my question was hypothetical, for the sake of documenting on wiki, of course you need evidence to back it up, however, I know you'll reply, but I shan't carry on the dialogue, nos da. Hogyncymru (talk) 23:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- So if 1000 people walked into a shop and saw exactly the same, would it be classed as 'POV'? Hogyncymru (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)