This article was nominated for deletion on October 6, 2004. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 October 2005. The result of the discussion was delete (later reversed by closing admin "having erroneously overlooked a few valid keep sentiments and arguments due to a deluge of sockpuppeteering").
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 october 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2007. The result of the discussion was speedy keep, please do not nominate unless someone willing and able to show their expert in the field says to.
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2007. The result of the discussion was delete.
Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
We're starting this page again, stop deleting it.
We're trying to make an article here, stop deleting it. We'll provide links and references, if you'll just let us work.
Keep: We're working on creating the article, it will never get finished if it keeps getting deleted ever 30 minutes.SenatorVidal 13:41, 13 Oct 2005 (PST)
Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The way the Wikipedia community works is that, when there's consensus to delete an article, it stays deleted. In order for this article to be undeleted, there would have to be some compelling evidence that could convince a consensus of users that the previous evaluation was incorrect. For an explanation of what's going on with webcomics in general, especially if you're a new user here, please see my page User:SCZenz/Webcomics--I put some work into explaining things clearly there. -- SCZenz16:35, 19 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
I looked over both the first and second AfDs for this comic and to be honest, did not find much of interest to add into this article. The main point of debate, particularly on the second discussion, was whether or not its Dayfree membership made it notable. My own conclusion at the time was that it does, but I don't think a consensus one way or the other was reached. Also touched on was the relative importance of expertise in AfD discussions. Though these debates were interesting from a metapedian point of view, I don't think they belong in article space. This article already does mention it is a member of Dayfree, which I think is about the only uncontested point that was brought up. Especially considering this particular AfD was one of the factors leading to the exit of several contributors, I am very reluctant to move anything contentious from it out of the Wikipedia: namespace. –Abe Dashiell(t/c)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Able and Baker (5th nomination)
