The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to abortion, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Daily page views
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abortion in Italy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editummm....is it just me or is the validity of this article questionable insofar that the newest statistics it reports are 13 years old (i.e. from 1999). The article is supposed to relate the current status of abortion in Italy, not a historical review of what once was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.97.118.2 (talk) 01:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
There do seem to be plenty of more recent statistics available, for example: [1] --91.209.142.224 (talk) 12:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
As of 4/7/2016, reference links are broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.96.79.126 (talk) 11:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Abortion in Italy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.urich.edu/~jolt/vlil/burk.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060912044603/http://faculty.cua.edu/pennington/Law111/ItalyAbortion.htm to http://faculty.cua.edu/pennington/Law111/ItalyAbortion.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080918092219/http://www.ben.iss.it:80/precedenti/aprile/1apr_en.htm to http://www.ben.iss.it/precedenti/aprile/1apr_en.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Abortion rate
editThis section is full of unsourced figures, starting with the astounding claim that less then 1 % of Italian pregnancies end in abortion. --Hjordmån (talk) 05:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- The number was altered twice [2] [3] first to 993, then 1 abortion per 1000 live births. Later, someone adjusted 1 to 9.8 per 1000 births, below 1 percent. These edits could be in good faith, but if so they had crappy sources. Probably at the moment, it would be better to just throw out huge chunks of unsouced text. --Hjordmån (talk) 21:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- I started making sense of it, I think the author(s) confused the abortion rate per 1,000 live births vs the abortion rate per 1,000 women in fertile age. I still think most of the statistics that I left unchanged make little to no sense. --Broc (talk) 12:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
What does this mean?
editThis is not a sentence, but I also don't understand what point is supposed to be meant here:
"The Christian Democratic Party had governed Italy since 1948, together with the Italian Communist Party's interpretation of the importance of Catholicism for any analysis of the balance of forces."
??