Talk:Abortion trial of Emily Stowe

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

I'd question the use of the phrase "pro-choice" in this article. While the morality of abortion was certainly debated, the concept and phrase of "pro-choice" is relatively modern and seems odd in this context. Perhaps it could be rewritten "While it is unlikely Stowe intended to take a position in favour of a woman's right to choose" or something similar Rmcubed 02:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

WP:BB CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 18:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abortion trial of Emily Stowe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply