This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Are you guys sure about his birthday? His birthday in 1910 is the same as for Abraham Bankier, No. 69062 on Schindler's list. But as far as I know, the Abraham Bankier that Oskar Schindler worked with was Abraham Bankier born in 1895, No. 69268 on Schindler's list. See also jewishgen.org. The Abraham Bankier who owned the Rekord factory to my private knowledge had two sons, H. Bankier and M. Bankier with the latter born in 1924. That wouldn't work if his father was born in 1910. Can anyone help? --Schwierigkeitenmacher (talk) 14:13, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
I agree that the 1910 date seems off. I checked the print sources I own, including the Crowe book but I didn’t find a reference to his age or birth date. Since he is referred to as No. 69268 at the Jewishgen source as you’ve pointed out, and the first external link seems to indicate 19th century, I think it would be best to change it to 1895. I will do so. Also, please feel free to contribute to this page using reliable sources. Linguistical (talk) 03:13, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
