Claim about Einstein

edit

can someone provide a citation for the claim about Einstein Salsb 23:17, 13 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

It really doesn't belong in this article anyway. --Blainster 12:57, 14 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Joffe and Einstein's 1905 papers

edit

"That year Ioffe stated he saw the names of two authors, Einstein – Marić, on the Annus Mirabilis papers when they were submitted."

This is erroneous. Joffe did not say he saw the original papers, nor that there were two authors' names on the 1905 papers. For refutation of this story, see:

http://www.esterson.org/Stachel_Joffe.htm

https://webspace.utexas.edu/aam829/1/m/Maric_files/EvidenceMaric.pdf

"This seems to support the theory that the work was a co-authorship between Einstein and his wife.[1]" [Ref. "Einstein's Wife", PBS, 2003]

The "Einstein's Wife" documentary has been discredited for its numerous inaccuracies and misconceptions: http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2006/12/einsteins_wife_the_relative_motion_of_facts.html

I shall amend the paragraph appropriately. Esterson (talk) 08:48, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abram Ioffe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply