Talk:Absolute Proof
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bias
editPlease be impartial. I know you get a lit of money from certain bias organizations, but please don't be so obvious. 1.75.243.144 (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- I'm ready to hear all the bias organizations I get my money from, because that is some news to me. Uness232 (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- I don't get the "organizations" part either, but some of the editors here could ease their bias on here a little. I mean, really: "Lindell's website, LindellTV, was inoperative for about an hour – a problem Lindell says, without providing proof, was the result of a hack."? Without providing proof? What were you all expecting him to do: pull out a piece of paper and say, "I've gotten this from the hackers. It says, 'We've hacked your livestream ha ha ha.'"? Just saying. 2604:CB00:13B:DD00:A0B6:D737:9D47:C443 (talk) 11:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 August 2021
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the last paragraph of the "Legacy section" they say that Lindell had predicted that Trump would be reinstated as president on September 13, the day after the symposium. The day after the symposium was actually August 13, and that was his actual "reinstatement date." Please change the word "September" there to "August". 2604:CB00:13B:DD00:DD54:A0F8:D4C0:FC53 (talk) 11:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Done. Horsesizedduck (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. 2604:CB00:13B:DD00:ADB9:ACFE:7B3A:A64B (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Is the Cyber Symposium Section Necessary?
editIs the Cyber Symposium section of the page relevant to the page itself? If not, I wonder if we should move this section to the page on Mike Lindell. Any reasons why we should keep this section on the page? 173.187.151.50 (talk) 20:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
We should just say “false”
editWhen discussing “Trump won”, we shouldn’t hesitate to use the word “false”, because the claim that Trump won the 2020 election is objectively false.
I commend this article for mentioning that it’s a conspiracy theory and that the fact-checkers debunked its claims.
But I think we should go one step further and actually put the word “false” at several points in the article, including the opening paragraph.
I think it should say, “……[it] promotes the FALSE conspiracy theory that Donald Trump won the……”.
Thegoldenconciseencyclopediaofmammals (talk) 02:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)